HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 313/2019

Om Prakash S/o Late Shri Sawant Ram, Aged About 62 Years,

B/c Dhanka, R/o Village And Post Alsisar, Tehsil Malsisar, District

Jhunjhunu (Raj.) (Father In Law Of Abducted Smt. Dholi Devi @

Dholti)

----Petitioner

Versus

1.

State Of Rajasthan, Through Home Secretary,

Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)

2.

Director General Of Police, Police Headquarter, Jaipur

(Raj.)

3.

Additional Director General Of Police, Anti Human

Trafficking, Unit Jaipur (Raj.)

4.

Superintendent Of Police, Jhunjhunu, District Jhunjhunu

(Raj.)

5.

S.H.O. Of Police, Station Sadar, Malsisar, District

Jhunjhunu (Raj.)

6.

Subhita W/o Shri Banwari Lal, Aged About 45 Years, B/c

Jat, R/o Alsisar, Police Station Malsisar, District Jhunjhunu

(Raj)

7.

Rajendra @ Kalu S/o Bhanwar Lal Godara, B/c Jat, R/o

Shyorani Tan Nohar, Tehsil Nohar District Hanumangarh

(Raj.)

8.

Vinod S/o Gopichand, B/c Jat, R/o Shyorani Tan Nohar,

Tehsil Nohar District Hanumangarh (Raj.)

9.

Mukesh S/o Gopichand, B/c Jat, R/o Shyorani Tan Nohar,

Tehsil Nohar District Hanumangarh (Raj.)

10.

Mukesh S/o Unkown, B/c Jat, R/o Shyorani Tan Nohar,

Tehsil Nohar District Hanumangarh (Raj.)

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Rajesh Bhamboo

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA

(2 of 2)

[HC-313/2019]

Judgment / Order

18/12/2019

Petitioner has filed this habeas corpus petition under Article

226 of The Constitution of India.

We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and have

gone through the record available on the file carefully.

It is the case of the petitioner that his daughter-in-law is

missing since 21.08.2019. Petitioner has already lodged missing

report and FIR Annexure-2 has been registered by the police at

the instance of the petitioner.

Thus, petitioner has already taken recourse to law by lodging

the FIR with regard to the offence-in-question and the same is

being investigated by the Investigating Agency.

No ground for interference by this court is made out.

Dismissed.

(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J

(SABINA),J

Mohita /42