SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

Anand Lama – Appellant
Versus
Union of India and Ors – Respondent


Advocates:
['Ms Gita Bista', '', 'Mr Pratap Khati', 'Mr Sunil Mathews', 'Mr Amrit Singh', 'Mr Thupden G Bhutia']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM

CIVIL JURISDICTION

W.P.(PIL) No. 40/2011

Anand Lama vs. Union of India & Ors.

BEFORE

HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

MR. JUSTICE N.K. JAIN

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. K. SINHA, JUDGE

22. 13.08.14 Present:

M/s. Pratap Khati, Navin Sharma and Pritima Sunam,

(Jain, CJ)

Advocates for the Petitioner.

Mr. Anand Lama, Petitioner in person.

M/s. A. Mariarputham, Advocate General, J.B.

Pradhan, Addl. Advocate General, Karma Thinlay, Sr.

Govt. Advocate with S.K. Chettri and Pollin Rai,

Asstt. Govt. Advocates for State- respondents.

M/s. A.K. Upadhyaya, Sr. Advocate with Binita Chhetri

and Aruna Chhetri, Advocates on behalf of additional

respondent (R.V. Shahi) Chairman, Energy Infratech

Pvt. Ltd.

Learned counsel for petitioner after arguing the case

for some time, on instructions, sought permission to

withdraw this petition.

Prayer is not opposed by learned Advocate General.

In view of the above, we allow this writ petition to be

withdrawn. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as

withdrawn with no order as to costs.

Judge

Chief Justice

13.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top