SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
Chhabil Dass Agarwal – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


1

Arb. P. No.02 of 2020

CHHABIL DASS AGARWAL

…PETITIONER

VERSUS

STATE OF SIKKIM AND ORS.

…RESPONDENTS

Date: 08.10.2020

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUP KUMAR GOSWAMI, CHIEF JUSTICE

Heard Mr. A. Moulik, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the

petitioner and Mr. Sudesh Joshi, learned Additional Advocate General,

Sikkim appearing for the respondents.

2.

By this application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and

Conciliation Act, 1996 the petitioner has prayed for appointment of an

arbitrator.

3.

It may be noted at the very outset that this application is not

opposed by Mr. Joshi.

4.

The petitioner was awarded a work order dated 16.02.2004 for a

work which was subsequently renamed as “CONSTRUCTION OF

2X5MVA, 66/11 KV SUB/STATION WITH LILO FROM PHODONG 66KV

S/S AND MEYONG-C-POWER HOUSE AT MANGAN”.

5.

A detailed narration of the developments that had taken place

during all these years is not considered necessary for the purpose of

this application. Suffice it is to say that a Contract Agreement was

entered into by and between the parties on 24.02.2004. General

Conditions of Contract governing the parties contain an arbitra

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top