SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM
Raju Prasad – Appellant
Versus
The State of Sikkim – Respondent


Advocates:
['Mr U P Sharma', 'Legal Aid Counsel', 'Ms Pollin Rai', 'Asst Public Prosecutor', '', 'Mr S K Chettri', 'Mr Thinlay d bhutia', 'Addl Public Prosecutor']

1

Crl. Appeal No.17 of 2018

Raju Prasad v. State of Sikkim

THE HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM: GANGTOK

(Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SINGLE BENCH: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BHASKAR RAJ PRADHAN, JUDGE

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Criminal Appeal No. 17 of 2018

Raju Prasad

S/o Shri Sambu Ram,

R/o Rangpo,

East Sikkim.

.Appellant

versus

State of Sikkim

. Respondent

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Appeal under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal

Procedure, 1973.

Appearance:

Mr. U. P. Sharma, Legal Aid Counsel assisted by Mr.

Mahendra Thapa and Mr. Kushan Limboo, Advocates

for the Appellant.

Mr. Thinlay Dorjee Bhutia, Additional Public Prosecutor

for the State-Respondent.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

J U D G M E N T ( O R A L )

(04.03.2019)

Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J

1.

Heard. This is an appeal filed by the Appellant against

his conviction under Section 9(m) of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top