Jyoti Agarwal vs State Of Sikkim and Ors

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Jyoti Agarwal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Sikkim and Ors – Respondent

Advocates:
['Mr Saurav Singh', '', 'Mr Pushkar Mehrotra', 'Ms Sunita Chettri', 'Mr Santosh Yadav', 'Mr Sishir Mothay', 'Ms Bandana Pradhan', 'Mr Sujan Sunwar', 'Asst Govt Advocate', '', 'PEMA BHUTIA', 'ASST GOVT ADVOCATE', 'Mr Yadev Sharma', 'Govt Advocate', 'Ms Yeshi W Rinchen', 'Mr Thinlay D Bhutia', 'Mr Hissey Gyaltsen', 'Astt Govt Advocate', 'S K CHETTRI', 'GOVT ADVOCATE']

THE HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM : GANGTOK

(Civil Extraordinary Jurisdiction)

DATED : 16^th August, 2021

------------------------------------------------------------------

SINGLE BENCH: THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI MADAN RAI, JUDGE

------------------------------------------------------------------

W.P.(C) No.56 of 2018

Petitioner

Jyoti Agarwal

versus

Respondents

State of Sikkim and Others

Petition under Article 226

of the Constitution of India

---------------------------------------------------------------

Appearance

Mr. Pushkar Mehrotra with Mr. Saurav Singh, Advocates for

the Appellant.

Dr. (Ms.) Doma T. Bhutia, Additional Advocate General with

Mr. S.K. Chettri, Government Advocate for State-Respondents

No.1 and 2.

Mr. Karma Thinlay, Senior Advocate with Mr. Thinlay Dorjee

Bhutia, Advocate for Respondent No.3.

None for Respondents No.4 and 5.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

J U D G M E N T

Meenakshi Madan Rai, J.

The Petitioner, by filing the instant Writ Petition, seeks

the following reliefs;

Writ or Direction i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

Jyoti Agarwal – AppellantVersusState Of Sikkim and Ors – Respondent

Jyoti Agarwal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Sikkim and Ors – Respondent