SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

Ganga Maya Gurung – Appellant
Versus
State Of Sikkim and Ano – Respondent


Advocates:
['Ms GITA BISTA', 'LEGAL AID COUNSEL', 'Mr Thinlay d bhutia', 'Govt Advocate', '', 'Mr Meg Nath Dhungel', 'M N DHUNGEL']

THE HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM : GANGTOK

(Civil Extraordinary Jurisdiction)

DATED : 20.07.2019

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SINGLE BENCH : THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI MADAN RAI, JUDGE

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

WP(C) No.8 of 2016

Petitioner

:

Ganga Maya Gurung

versus

Respondents

:

The State of Sikkim and Another

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India

---------------------------------------------------------------

Appearance

Mr. N.B. Khatiwada, Senior Advocate (Legal Aid Counsel) with

Ms. Gita Bisa, Advocate (Legal Aid Counsel) for the Petitioner.

Dr. Doma T. Bhutia, Additional Advocate General with Mr.

Thupden Youngda, Government Advocate and Ms. Pollin Rai,

Assistant Government Advocate for the Respondent No.1.

Mr. M.N. Dhungel, Advocate for the Respondent No.2.

---------------------------------------------------------------

J U D G M E N T

Meenakshi Madan Rai, J.

1.

Claiming abrogation of her fundamental rights as

guaranteed under Article 14 of the Constitut

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top