SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

RAJA PAUL AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
SUDARSHAN SHARMA – Respondent


Advocates:
['S CHAKRABORTY', '', 'KOHINOOR N BHATTACHARYYA', 'Mr S K DEB']

1

CRP No.102 of 2016

Page 1 of 13

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA

A G A R T A L A

CRP 102 OF 2016

1. Sri Raj Paul,

2. Bijoy Krishna Paul,

-both are sons of late Bankim Paul,

residents of village & P.O. Rajbari,

P.S. Dharmanagar, North Tripura

………………… Petitioners

– Vs –

Sri Sudarsan Sharma,

son of late Shyam Sundar Sharma,

resident of village Deochara,

P.S. & P.O. Panisagar,

District: North Tripura

.........………Respondent

B E F O R E

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. TALAPATRA

For the petitioners

:

Mr. K.N. Bhattacharji, Senior Advocate

Ms. S. Chakraborty, Advocate

For the respondent

: Mr. S.K. Deb, Senior Advocate

Mr. S. Bhattacharji, Advocate

Date of hearing

: 28.02.2017

Date of judgment & order : 06.03.2017

Whether fit for reporting : YES

JUDGMENT & ORDER

This is a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of

India against the judgment dated 06.10.2016 delivered in Civil Misc.

Appeal No.05 of 2016 by the District Judge, North Tripura,

2

CRP No.102 of 2016

Page 2 of 13

Dharmanagar

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top