SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA
Sri Milan Kumar Chowdhury – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tripura and 5 Ors – Respondent


Advocates:
['Mr B BANERJEE', '', 'Ms R MAJUMDER', 'L CHAKRABORTY', 'Sr GA', '', 'Mr PARTHA SAHA']

Page 1 of 3

HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA

AGARTALA

WP(C) 410 OF 2021

Sri Milan Kumar Chowdhury Vrs. The State of Tripura & 5 Ors.

Present:

For the petitioner (s)

: Mr. B. Banerjee, Advocate.

For the respondent (s)

: Mr. D. Bhattacharya, G.A.

Mr. P. Saha, Advocate.

HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ARINDAM LODH

28.11.2022

Order

Heard Mr. B. Banerjee, learned counsel appearing for the

petitioner. Also heard Mr. D. Bhattacharya, learned G.A. assisted by Mr.

P. Saha, learned counsel appearing for the State-respondents.

It is the case of the petitioner that he was engaged as part-time

worker under the Tripura Forest Development & Plantation Corporation

Ltd. (for short, TFDPC) in the year 2005. Record speaks that the petitioner

was not appointed following the established norms of employment as

enshrined under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India. In State of

Karnataka & Ors. Vrs. Uma Devi (3) & Ors. reported in (2006) 4 SCC 1,it

was held that those irregularly appointed employees may be regularized

and for that purpose, all the State Governments were directed to frame

schemes. According to the case of Uma Devi (supra), the persons who

compl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top