SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA
Maharam Ali – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Tripura – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA

A G A R T A L A

CRL. REV. P. No.117 of 2013

Maharam Ali,

son of Md. Ruhul Amir of village – Rani,

P.S. Kakraban, P.O. Rani, District –

South Tripura, presently Gomati, Tripura

…… Petitioner

– V e r s u s –

The State of Tripura

.….. Respondent

BEFORE

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S. TALAPATRA

For the petitioner

: Mr. A. Sengupta, Advocate

For the respondent

: Mr. A. Ghosh, P.P.

Date of hearing and

: 18.03.2016

delivery of judgment & order

Whether it is fit for reporting :

JUDGMENT & ORDER (ORAL)

Heard Mr. A. Sengupta, learned counsel appearing

for the petitioner as well as Mr. A. Ghosh, learned P.P. appearing

for the State.

[2]

By means of this petition filed under Section 397

read with read with Section 401 of the Cr.P.C., the legality of the

judgment dated 22.11.2013 delivered in Criminal Appeal

No.28(3) of 2013 by the Sessions Judge, South Tripura,

Udaipur, now Gomati Judicial District has been called in

Yes No

CRL. REV. P. No.117 of 2013

Page 2 of 8

[2]

question. By the said judgment

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top