SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

RAVI GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
SHASHANK GUPTA – Respondent


Advocates:
['JAGDISH S BISHT', '', 'ATUL BHATT', 'UDYOG SHUKLA', '', 'ANURAG BISARIA', 'RAJIV KUMAR SAXENA', 'SUDHIR KUMAR', 'ANANT KUMAR AGARWAL', 'PURAN SINGH BISHT']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND

AT NAINITAL

ON THE 23RD DAY OF MARCH, 2021

BEFORE:

HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR TIWARI

WRIT PETITION (M/S) No. 2240 of 2010

BETWEEN:

Ravi Gupta. ……….Petitioner

(There is no representation for the petitioner)

AND:

Shashank Gupta and another. ....Respondents

(By Mr. Sudhir Kumar, Advocate for respondent no. 1)

JUDGMENT

The matter was listed on 22.03.2021.

Since there was no representation for the petitioner,

therefore, the case was directed to be listed today.

Today also, there is no representation for the

petitioner; although, name of petitioner’s counsel is

mentioned in the cause list.

2.

This Writ Petition, under Article 227 of

Constitution of India, has been filed challenging the

order dated 12.11.2010 passed by Additional Chief

Revenue Commissioner, Uttarakhand in mutation

proceedings, whereby the order passed by Additional

Commissioner, allowing the impleadment application

of the petitioner, was set aside, by holding that a

revisional Court cannot add a stranger to the

proceedings as party respondent.

2

3.

It transpires that

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top