HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
RAJESH KUMAR CHAUHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AT NAINITAL
SRI JUSTICE S.K. MISHRA, A.C.J.
AND
SRI JUSTICE A.K. VERMA, J.
07TH JANUARY, 2022
WRIT PETITION (S/B) No. 15 OF 2022
Between:
Rajesh Kumar Chauhan.
…Petitioner
and
State of Uttarakhand and another.
…Respondents
Counsel for the petitioner.
:
Mr. Sandeep Kothari, the learned
counsel.
Counsel for the respondents.
:
Mr. Anil Kumar Bisht, the learned
Additional Chief Standing Counsel for
the State of Uttarakhand.
Upon hearing the learned Counsel, the Court made
the following
JUDGMENT : (per Sri S.K. Mishra, A.C.J.)
In this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed
for a writ of certiorari quashing the impugned transfer
order dated 25.12.2021 passed by respondent No. 1,
which is annexed as Annexure-1, whereby the petitioner
has been transferred from Construction Division, Public
Works
Department,
Roorkee,
District-Haridwar
to
Provincial Division, Public Works Department, Bhatwari,
District–Uttarkashi.
2
2.
This Court is of the opinion that the provisions
of the Uttarakhand Annual Transfer Act, 2017 are all
directory,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.