SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SHAHRUKH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Advocates:
['MOHD SAFDAR', '', 'GAURAV SINGH', 'VINOD SHARMA', 'SEEMA BELWAL SHARMA', 'G A']

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND

AT NAINITAL

Bail Application No.55 of 2020

Shahrukh

..…Applicant

(In Jail)

Vs.

State of Uttarakhand

…Opposite Party

Advocate: Mr. Vinod Sharma, Advocate for the applicant.

Mr. V.K. Gemini, Deputy Advocate General for the State of Uttarakhand.

Hon’ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.

This bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C., has been

preferred by the applicant, seeking his release on bail, for his alleged

involvement in commission of an offence under Section 8/22/60 of

Narcotics Drugs & Psychotropic Substances, Act (hereinafter referred to as

the NDPS Act) which was registered against him by way of Case Crime

No.787 of 2019 at P.S. Kotwali, Roorkee, District Haridwar on

15.12.2019. This judgment has to be not only a simplicitor consideration of

bail application; but, would also be, dealing with the authorities, which had

been relied by the counsel for the applicant for substantiating, his case for

consideration of the bail application and his consequential release.

2.

The precise facts which engages

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top