SHAHRUKH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AT NAINITAL
Bail Application No.55 of 2020
Shahrukh
..…Applicant
(In Jail)
Vs.
State of Uttarakhand
…Opposite Party
Advocate: Mr. Vinod Sharma, Advocate for the applicant.
Mr. V.K. Gemini, Deputy Advocate General for the State of Uttarakhand.
Hon’ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.
This bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C., has been
preferred by the applicant, seeking his release on bail, for his alleged
involvement in commission of an offence under Section 8/22/60 of
Narcotics Drugs & Psychotropic Substances, Act (hereinafter referred to as
the NDPS Act) which was registered against him by way of Case Crime
No.787 of 2019 at P.S. Kotwali, Roorkee, District Haridwar on
15.12.2019. This judgment has to be not only a simplicitor consideration of
bail application; but, would also be, dealing with the authorities, which had
been relied by the counsel for the applicant for substantiating, his case for
consideration of the bail application and his consequential release.
2.
The precise facts which engages
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.