SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sharad Kumar Sharma
HEERA SINGH PANGTEY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (M/S) No. 2364 of 2015 Heera Singh Pangtey and others ..…Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and others .… Respondents Present :-

Mr. T.A. Khan, Senior Advocate, assisted by Mr. Ravi Shankar Kandpal, Advocate, for the petitioners.

Mr. V.D. Bisen, Brief Holder, for the State of Uttarakhand.

Mr. Rakesh Thapliyal, Assistant Solicitor General, assisted by Mr. Pankaj Chaturvedi and Mr. Lalit Sharma, Standing Counsel, for the Union of India.

Date of Reserved : 05.10.2021 Date of Judgment : 04.03.2022

JUDGEMENT

Hon’ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.

Floreat Alma Mater, our Great Nation India.

2. The aforesaid reference has a relevance in the context of the issue involved, and the relevance of a Country for each and every citizen, who resides in it. The reference of the term “Alma Mater” in its literal and contextual meaning would mean a “generous Mother” and that is why our Country is the only country in the World, which is referred as to be the “Motherland”. If the two references of the word “Alma Mater” is preceded with the word used as “floreat”, that too has a reference denoting to the flourishment of the country and to its long life, which wo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top