HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
MOHAMMAD FAROOQ – Appellant
Versus
Sadi Lal – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Writ Petition (M/S) No. 1504 of 2007
Mohammad Farooq & another … Petitioners
Versus
Sadi Lal
… Respondent
Mr. Tapan Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Aditya Singh, Advocate for the respondent.
Dated: 03.01.2019
Hon’ble Manoj K. Tiwari, J. (Oral)
Petitioners are aggrieved by the orders dated
31.05.1994 passed by Consolidation Officer, Roorkee;
27.11.2001 passed by Assistant Settlement Officer of
Consolidation
and
15.06.2007
passed
by
Deputy
Director, Consolidation (Annexure 4, 8 & 10 to the writ
petition).
2.
Facts of the case in brief are that respondent –
Sadilal (respondent herein) filed an objection under
Section 9 of Consolidation of Holdings Act stating that
name of petitioner No. 1 and Mohd. Hasan S/o
Alimuddin has been wrongly recorded in revenue records
as Bhumidhar with transferable rights over the land
comprised in plot no. 228, 259 and 231/7 situate in
Village Padali Gujjar, Tehsil Roorkee, District Haridwar.
The said objection was registered as Case No. 787 before
Consolidation
Officer,
Roorkee
(West).
Respondent
contended
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.