SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
MOHAMMAD FAROOQ – Appellant
Versus
Sadi Lal – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

Writ Petition (M/S) No. 1504 of 2007

Mohammad Farooq & another … Petitioners

Versus

Sadi Lal

… Respondent

Mr. Tapan Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Aditya Singh, Advocate for the respondent.

Dated: 03.01.2019

Hon’ble Manoj K. Tiwari, J. (Oral)

Petitioners are aggrieved by the orders dated

31.05.1994 passed by Consolidation Officer, Roorkee;

27.11.2001 passed by Assistant Settlement Officer of

Consolidation

and

15.06.2007

passed

by

Deputy

Director, Consolidation (Annexure 4, 8 & 10 to the writ

petition).

2.

Facts of the case in brief are that respondent –

Sadilal (respondent herein) filed an objection under

Section 9 of Consolidation of Holdings Act stating that

name of petitioner No. 1 and Mohd. Hasan S/o

Alimuddin has been wrongly recorded in revenue records

as Bhumidhar with transferable rights over the land

comprised in plot no. 228, 259 and 231/7 situate in

Village Padali Gujjar, Tehsil Roorkee, District Haridwar.

The said objection was registered as Case No. 787 before

Consolidation

Officer,

Roorkee

(West).

Respondent

contended

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top