SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SMT PUSHPA BUDIYAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND and OTHERS – Respondent


Advocates:
['ALOK MAHRA', 'BHAGWAT MEHRA', 'C S C', 'ADDL C S C U P', 'ASST S G', 'B D KANDPAL']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT

NAINITAL

Writ Petition (S/B) No. 29 of 2010

Smt. Pushpa Budiyal

……Petitioner.

Versus

State of Uttarakhand and others.

…Respondents.

Mr. Manoj Tiwari, Senior Advocate with Mr. Alok Mehra, Advocate for the

petitioner.

Mr. P.C. Bisht, Advocate for respondent nos. 1 and 2.

Mr. B.D. Kandpal and Mr. B.D. Pande, Advocates for respondent no. 3.

Ms. Beena Pande, Advocate for respondent nos. 4 and 5.

Ms. Anjali Bhargava, Advocate for respondent nos. 6 and 7.

Mr. Paresh Tripathi, Advocate for the interveners.

Coram: Hon’ble J.S. Khehar, C.J.

Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.

J.S. Khehar, C.J, (Oral)

1.

The petitioner was inducted into the service of the

Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission as a Lower

Division Assistant in 1999. At the time of induction of the

petitioner into the service of the Commission, the Uttar

Pradesh Public Service Commission was catering to the

needs of the composite State of Uttar Pradesh.

2.

Just before the reorganisation of the composite

State of Uttar Pradesh, with effect from 9.11.2000 into

the successor States of Uttarakhand and Uttar Prades

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top