SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

PAPPU ALIAS PUSHKAR SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND THROUGH DISTRICT MAGISTRATE CHAMPAWAT – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT

NAINITAL

Criminal Revision No.296 of 2014

1. Pappu alias Pushkar Singh

2. Girdhari Singh

Both sons of Sri Keshar Singh,

Both R/o Village Majhpeepal,

Thana Pancheswar,

District Champawat

.…Revisionists

Versus

State of Uttarakhand

….. Respondent

Mr. Devesh Upreti, Advocate for the revisionists.

Mr. V.S. Rathore and Mr. Ranjan Ghildiyal, A.G.A. for the

State.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Lok Pal Singh, J.

This criminal revision is directed against

the judgment and order dated 02.08.2013 passed by

Chief Judicial Magistrate, Champawat in Criminal

Case No.174 of 2013 State vs. Pappu alias Pushkar

Singh and another, whereby the accused-revisionists

have been convicted u/s 452 of I.P.C. and have been

convicted sentenced to simple imprisonment for a

period of one year alongwith a fine of Rs. 500/-. They

have further directed u/s 323 of IPC and have been

sentenced to simple imprisonment for a period of six

months along with a fine of Rs.500/- each. In default

of payment of fine, the revisionists have to undergo

simple imprisonment for a period of one month. They

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top