SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DAULAT SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAKHAND – Respondent


Advocates:
['SHRADDHA PANDIT', '', 'TARUN PANDE', 'G A']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

Criminal Misc. Application No. 91 of 2021

Daulat Singh

…Applicant

Vs.

State of Uttarakhand and another

...Respondents

Ms. Shraddha Pandit, learned counsel for the applicant.

Mr. A.K. Sah, learned Deputy Advocate General for the State of

Uttarakhand.

Dated: 7th April, 2021

Hon’ble N.S. Dhanik, J.

This criminal misc. application has been preferred by

the applicant challenging the order dated 29.02.2020 passed by

District Judge, District Udham Singh Nagar in Criminal

Revision No. 78 of 2019, “Daulat Singh v. Nirmal Singh & Ors”.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

3.

Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that

on 29.02.2020, the aforesaid revision was listed for hearing and

the advocate for the revisionist (present applicant herein) could

not appear before the Court and the learned District Judge,

Udham Singh Nagar dismissed the said revision in default

ignoring the position of law i.e. the criminal revision has to be

decided on merit, even if the counsel for the parties are not

present to make their submissi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top