HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

Criminal Misc. Application No.124 of 2022

Yogendra Kumar & others ......Petitioners

Vs.

State of Uttarakhand & another …..... Respondents

Present : Mr. Aditya Singh, Advocate for the applicants.

Mr. Lalit Miglani, AGA for the State.

Mr. Gaurav Singh, Advocate for the private respondent.

Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J (Oral).

The challenge in this petition is made to the

charge-sheet

dated

14.10.2017,

cognizance

and

summoning order dated 11.01.2018, passed in Case

No.806/2018, State vs. Yogendra Kumar & others, under

Sections 406, 420 IPC, by the court of Chief Judicial

Magistrate, Haridwar (“the Case”).

2.

Facts necessary to appreciate the controvery,

briefly stated, are as follows:-

Respondent no.2 Surendra Kumar (“the

informant”) filed an FIR on 27.07.2017 against the

petitioners under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471

IPC. According to it, the petitioners sold two plots

bearing nos.85 and 86 to the son of the informant

on misrepresentation by showing a map of

residential colony. The permission under Section

143 of the Uttar Pradesh Zami