SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD – Appellant
Versus
SRI. NAIMUDDIN – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND

AT NAINITAL

SHRI JUSTICE S.K. MISHRA, THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE

Date of hearing : 01.12.2021

Date of Judgment : 25.03.2022

APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 210 OF 2011

Between:

Smt. Hashmi

……Appellant / claimant

and

Jalaluddin and another

…… Respondents

Counsel for the appellant

:

Mr. Z.U. Siddiquie, learned

counsel

Counsel for respondent No. 2 :

Mr. M.K. Goyal, learned counsel

WITH

APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 236 OF 2011

Between:

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd.

……

Appellant

and

Naimuddin and others

…… Respondents

Counsel for the appellant

:

Mr. M.K. Goyal, learned counsel

Counsel for the respondents :

Mr.

Z.U.

Siddiquie,

learned

counsel

Upon hearing the learned counsel, the Court

made the following:

2

JUDGMENT:

As both the appeal arises out of the same

judgment, they are being disposed of together by the

common judgment.

2)

In Appeal from Order No. 236 of 2011, the

Insurance Company has appealed against the order

pas

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top