SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
DHARAMPAL SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


SL.

No

Date

Office Notes, reports,

orders or proceedings

or directions and

Registrar’s order with

Signatures

COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS

WPMS No. 233 of 2019

Hon’ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.

Mr. Tapan Singh, Advocate, for the

petitioner.

Mr. Suyash Pant, Standing Counsel, for

the State.

In a pending Suit, which was preferred

by the petitioner, who is a plaintiff under

Section 229B of the U.P.Z.A. & L.R. Act, on an

application under Section 229D of the U.P.Z.A

& L.R. Act, the Court of Assistant Collector, 1st

Class, Vikas Nagar, by an order dated

05.05.2011, had passed the following order:-

**i=koyh

is”kA

idk”ku

gsrq

vkns”kA i=koyh 20-6-11 dks izLrqr gksA

27-6-11 rd ;FkkfLFkfr cuk;h j[kh

tk;sA**

The power to grant of an interim order

in a proceedings under Section 229B of the

U.P.Z.A & L.R. Act, as per the principles laid

down therein, the provisions of Section 229D of

the U.P.Z.A & L.R. Act are supplemental in

nature, to the provisions contained under Order

39 Rule 1 & 2 of the CPC, and it stipulates that

the authorities concerned, who passes an order

under Section 229B, has had to apply its judicial

mind and then pass an order, under Sec

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top