GAURAV – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
Reserved Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AT NAINITAL
Criminal Appeal No. 41 of 2011
Garuav ..…..Appellant.
versus
State of Uttarakhand ……Opposite Party.
………………………..
Mrs. Pushpa Joshi, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Amit
Kapri, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. Amit Bhatt, Additional Government Advocate for the
State / respondent.
JUDGMENT
Coram: Hon’ble Barin Ghosh, C.J.
Hon’ble U.C. Dhyani, J.
Per: U.C. Dhyani, J.
In the instant case, P.W.1 Kamal Gupta
lodged complaint (Ext.Ka-1) against accused
persons on January 12, 2002. The same was
registered as case crime no. 24 / 2002 under
Sections 394, 302, 201 IPC by P.S. Lansdowne,
District Pauri Garhwal on 12.01.2002 at 8:00 a.m.
The occurrence took place on 11.01.2002 at
2
unknown time. The distance between place of
occurrence
and
P.S.
Lansdowne
was
27
kilometres. Hence, there appeared to be no delay
in lodging chik FIR (Ext.Ka-9).
2.
Prosecution story was narrated by P.W.1
Kamal Gupta before the trial court. He said
amongst other things, that he was the Director /
Proprietor of M/s Shiv Dayal
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.