SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

GAURAV – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Reserved Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND

AT NAINITAL

Criminal Appeal No. 41 of 2011

Garuav ..…..Appellant.

versus

State of Uttarakhand ……Opposite Party.

………………………..

Mrs. Pushpa Joshi, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Amit

Kapri, Advocate for the appellant.

Mr. Amit Bhatt, Additional Government Advocate for the

State / respondent.

JUDGMENT

Coram: Hon’ble Barin Ghosh, C.J.

Hon’ble U.C. Dhyani, J.

Per: U.C. Dhyani, J.

In the instant case, P.W.1 Kamal Gupta

lodged complaint (Ext.Ka-1) against accused

persons on January 12, 2002. The same was

registered as case crime no. 24 / 2002 under

Sections 394, 302, 201 IPC by P.S. Lansdowne,

District Pauri Garhwal on 12.01.2002 at 8:00 a.m.

The occurrence took place on 11.01.2002 at

2

unknown time. The distance between place of

occurrence

and

P.S.

Lansdowne

was

27

kilometres. Hence, there appeared to be no delay

in lodging chik FIR (Ext.Ka-9).

2.

Prosecution story was narrated by P.W.1

Kamal Gupta before the trial court. He said

amongst other things, that he was the Director /

Proprietor of M/s Shiv Dayal

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top