HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Smt Aruna – Appellant
Versus
State Of Uttarakhand AND OTHERS – Respondent
SPA No.176/16
Hon’ble Rajiv Sharma, ACJ.
Hon’ble Manoj Kr. Tiwari, J.
Mr. Pankaj Miglani, Advocate vice Mr.
Niranjan Bhatt, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. BPS Mer, S.C., for the State.
This appeal is instituted against the
judgment dated 19.5.2016 rendered by a
learned Single Judge of this Court in WPSS
No.994 of 2016.
Key
facts,
necessary
for
the
adjudication
of
this
appeal,
are
that
deceased
Siya
Ram
Chamoli
died
on
12.12.2015. Appellant, being the daughter,
moved an application seeking compassionate
appointment under the ‘Dying-in-Harness’
Rules. However, the application moved by
the appellant was rejected on the ground
that she is the married daughter.
Appellant
has
relied
upon
the
judgment rendered by the Allahabad High
Court in Writ Petition No.60881 of 2015
(Smt. Vimla Srivastava v. State of U.P.),
whereby the Court directed to delete the
word ‘married’ before the word ‘daughter’ for
moving an application under the ‘Dying-in-
Harness’ Rules.
The present lis is squarely covered by
the judgment, cited hereinabove. Appellant
was
entitled
to
be
considered
for
‘compassionate
appointment’
being
the
married daughter
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.