SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

LEELA SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Advocates:
['GIRISH CHANDRA LAKHCHAURA', 'C S C', 'SARVESH AGARWAL', 'PULAK AGARWALBHARAT TEWARI']

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

Writ Petition (M/S) No. 246 of 2020

With

Interim Relief Application No. 1002/2020

Leela Singh

…Petitioner

Vs.

State of Uttarakhand and others

…Respondents

And

Writ Petition (M/S) No. 1008 of 2020

With

Stay Vacation Application No. 8743/2020

Kishan Lal and others

…Petitioners

Vs.

State of Uttarakhand and others

…Respondents

With

Writ Petition (M/S) No. 1010 of 2020

With

Stay Vacation Application No. 8744/2020

Chandrapal and another

…Petitioners

Vs.

State of Uttarakhand and others

…Respondents

Advocate:

Shri Dushyant Mainali, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Girish

Chandra Lakhchaura, Advocate, for the petitioners

Shri Sudhir Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the State of

Uttarakhand.

Shri Sarvesh Aggarwal, learned counsel for the private respondent(s).

18th November, 2020

Hon’ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.

(Via Video Conferencing)

Since common questions of law and facts are involved in the

present three writ petitions, the same are being decided together by this

common judgement.

2.

The petitioners in the above three writ

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top