LEELA SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Writ Petition (M/S) No. 246 of 2020
With
Interim Relief Application No. 1002/2020
Leela Singh
…Petitioner
Vs.
State of Uttarakhand and others
…Respondents
And
Writ Petition (M/S) No. 1008 of 2020
With
Stay Vacation Application No. 8743/2020
Kishan Lal and others
…Petitioners
Vs.
State of Uttarakhand and others
…Respondents
With
Writ Petition (M/S) No. 1010 of 2020
With
Stay Vacation Application No. 8744/2020
Chandrapal and another
…Petitioners
Vs.
State of Uttarakhand and others
…Respondents
Advocate:
Shri Dushyant Mainali, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Girish
Chandra Lakhchaura, Advocate, for the petitioners
Shri Sudhir Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the State of
Uttarakhand.
Shri Sarvesh Aggarwal, learned counsel for the private respondent(s).
18th November, 2020
Hon’ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.
(Via Video Conferencing)
Since common questions of law and facts are involved in the
present three writ petitions, the same are being decided together by this
common judgement.
2.
The petitioners in the above three writ
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.