SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Sanjeev Tiwari – Appellant
Versus
State Of Uttarakhand AND OTHERS – Respondent


Advocates:
['VIVEK PATHAK', '', 'K R GAZI', 'AHRAR BAIG', '', 'PANKAJ MIGLANI', 'AAKIB AHMED', 'SIDDHARTHA JAIN', 'G A', 'SIDDHARTH JAIN']

Reserved Judgment

REPORTABLE

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

Criminal Misc. Application No. 712 of 2017

Sanjeev Tiwari

.......Petitioner

Vs.

State of Uttarakhand and others

......Respondents

Mr. Arvind Vashistha, Senior Advocate holding brief of Mr. Vivek Pathak,

Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. S.S. Adhikari, A.G.A with Mr. P.S. Uniyal Brief Holder for the

State/respondent nos. 1 and 6.

Mr. S.K. Jain, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Siddhartha Jain, Advocate for the

respondent nos. 2, 3 and 5.

Mr. Pankaj Miglani, Advocate for the respondent no.4.

Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J.

The instant petition under Section 482 of the Code of

Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short “the Code”) has been filed to quash

and set aside the order dated 26.11.2016, passed in Misc. Application

No. 468 of 2016, Sanjeev Tiwari Vs. K.S. Rana and others, by the court

of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Udham Singh Nagar (for short “the

Case”) as well as judgment and order dated 16.05.2017, passed in

Criminal Revision No. 292 of 2016, Sanjeev Tiwari Vs. State of

Uttarakhand and others (for short “the revision”). By the impugn

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top