HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

Criminal Revision (CRLR No. 75 of 2012)

Shyam Lal @ Shyam Baboo

…Revisionist

Vs.

State of Uttarakhand

…Respondent

Advocate :

Mr. Siddhartha Sah, Advocate for the revisionist

Mr. P.S. Bohra, AGA for the State of Uttarakhand

Hon’ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.

The revisionist is the convict for commission of the

offences under Sections 279 and 304A IPC. As a consequence of the

culmination of trial vide its judgment impugned rendered by the Court

of Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division)/Judicial Magistrate,

District Udham Singh Nagar in Criminal Case Number 906 of 2010,

State of Uttarakhand v. Shyam Lal @ Shyam Babu, the trial Court

vide its judgement dated 9th October 2005, has convicted the

revisionist for the aforesaid offences. Being aggrieved against the

judgememnt of conviction by trial Court dated 9^th October 2005, the

revisionist preferred Criminal Appeal No. 147 of 2011, Shyam Lal @

Shyam Babu v. State of Uttarakhand, before the Court of District and

Sessions Judge, District Udham Singh Nagar. The Appeal too was

dismissed by the learned Appellate Court vide its judgement dated

24th