SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
KALLU AHMAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

Criminal Misc. Application No. 214 of 2022

Kallu Ahmad and Others

…........ Petitioners

Vs.

State of Uttarakhand and another

…..... Respondents

Present : Mr. Mohd. Safdar, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. V.S. Rathore, A.G.A. for the State.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)

Instant petition has been filed for quashing the

charge-sheet, which is basis of Criminal Case No.610 of

2021 “State vs. Shakib Ali and others” under Sections

147, 148, 149, 323, 325, 452, 504 and 506 IPC in the

Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Haridwar.

On 10-12-2021 cognizance has been taken in the case.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties through

Video Conferencing and perused the record.

3.

At the very outset, learned counsel for the

petitioners did not press for quashing the charge-sheet.

Learned counsel would submit that a direction be issued

to the court below to decide the bail application of the

2

petitioners, in view of the directions issued by the Hon’ble

Supreme Court in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil Vs.

Central Bureau of Investigation and anot

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top