SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

RAM KISHORE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

Original Jurisdiction

Dated: Nainital: the 08th day of July, 2010

First Bail Application No. 641 of 2010.

Criminal Side

Ram Kishore S/o Tej Ram

R/o Village Sitarampur,

Police Station Swar

District Rampur (U.P)

……...Applicant ( in Jail)

Versus

State of Uttarakhand.

…..….Opposite Party

Arising out of Crime/F.I.R. No. 41 of 2010

Under Section: 302, 120B, 34 I.P.C.

P.S. Jaspur

District: UdhamSingh Nagar.

-_______________________________________________________________________________________

Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J

Shri Prem Kaushal, Advocate, present for the applicant.

Shri G.S. Sandhu, G.A., with Shri M.A. Khan, Brief Holder, present

for the State.

Applicant-Ram Kishore who is in jail in connection with crime/F.I.R.

No. 41 of 2010, relating to offences punishable under section 302, 120B

read with section 34 I.P.C., P.S. Jaspur, District Udham Singh Nagar, has

sought his release on bail.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that it is a case of

circumstancial evidence. It is nowhere alleged in the first infor

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top