SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AYUSH ALIAS ANURAG – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Advocates:
['VAIBHAV SINGH CHAUHAN', '', 'NAINA MITTAL', 'SURESH CHANDRA BHATT', 'G A', '', 'GAURAV SINGH']

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

First Bail Application No.265 of 2022

Ayush alias Anurag

...Applicant

Versus

State of Uttarakhand

...Respondent

Present:-

Mr. S.C. Bhatt, Advocate for the applicant.

Mr. V.S. Rathore, A.G.A. for the State.

Mr. Gaurav Singh, Advocate for the informant.

Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)

Applicant Ayush alias Anurag, is in judicial

custody in FIR No. 483 of 2021, under Sections 354, 509

IPC, Section 11/12 and 13/14 of Protection of Children From

Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (for short, “the Act”) and Section

67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000, Police Station

Bahadrabad, District Haridwar. He has sought his release on

bail.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and

perused the record.

3.

According to the FIR, the applicant was used to

talk with the victim, a girl aged 16 years over the telephone.

Sometimes in the year 2021, the informant, who is father of

the victim found that the victim was tensed. He asked the

victim, as to what had happened to her? Thereafter, the

2

victim revealed that the applicant would follow on the way

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top