SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
RAJKUMAR LYALL – Appellant
Versus
SMT. MANISHA LYALL – Respondent


Advocates:
['DEVANG DOBHAL', '', 'LOKENDRA DOBHAL', 'D BARTHWAL', '', 'V K KAPARUWAN']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND

AT NAINITAL

Writ Petition No. (M/S) 2694 of 2016

Rajkumar Lyall

……….Petitioner

-Versus-

Smt. Manisha Lyall

.......Respondent

Present:

Mr. Lokendra Dobhal, the learned counsel for the

petitioner.

Mr. Dharmendra Barthwal, the learned counsel for the

respondent.

Sri S.K. Mishra, J.

Date of hearing and judgment

17.11.2021

1.

Heard Mr. Lokendra Dobhal, the learned counsel

for the petitioner and Mr. Dharmendra Barthwal, the

learned counsel for the respondent.

2.

In this writ application, the petitioner has prayed

for issuance of writ of certiorari quashing the order

09.06.2016 and 09.09.2016 passed by the learned

Principal Judge, family Court, Dehradun and quashing

the Original Suit No. 215 of 2013.

3.

The issue framed, was heard on 09.06.2016 by

the Principal Judge, Family Court, Dehradun whereby

the learned Judge rejected the objection of the

petitioner by holding that it has a jurisdiction to

decide the matter. It is not disputed in this case that

civil proceedings has been initiated by the petitioner

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top