SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Pradeep Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Uttarakhand AND OTHERS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

Special Appeal No. 398 of 2014

Pradeep Kumar

…….Appellant

Versus

State of Uttarakhand & others

…….Respondents

Mr. Mohit Kumar, Advocates for the appellant.

Mr. J.C. Pande, Brief Holder for the State.

JUDGMENT

Coram: Hon’ble Ramesh Ranganathan, C.J.

Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma, J.

Dated: 15th July, 2019

RAMESH RANGANATHAN, C.J. (Oral)

This appeal is preferred against the order passed by the learned

Single Judge in Writ Petition (S/S) No.1089 of 2013 dated 03.07.2014.

2.

A selection process was sought to be undertaken by the State

Government in the year 2011-12 for recruitment to Class III posts, which

were outside the purview of the State Public Service Commission. The

exercise of selection was entrusted to the Uttarakhand Technical Board of

Education, Roorkee, Haridwar which issued an advertisement on 20.12.2011

for these vacancies. A combined test for Class III posts was conducted in

various departments. The advertisement stipulated that, for some posts,

typing was an essential qualification and for others it was not. The posts of

Junior Assistants, in the Forest and E

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top