SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
DIVYA SINGH – Appellant
Versus
PROJECT DIRECTOR NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates:
['ROBIN SIROHI', '', 'PRABHAKAR NARAYAN', 'NARESH PANT']

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

Appeal from Order No. 61 of 2022

Omkar Singh

..…Appellant.

Versus

Project Director National Highway Authority of India and

others

.… Respondents

With

Appeal from Order No. 62 of 2022

Ramesh Kumari

..…Appellant.

Versus

Project Director National Highway Authority of India and

others

.… Respondents

With

Appeal from Order No. 63 of 2022

Divya Singh and another

..…Appellants.

Versus

Project Director National Highway Authority of India and

others

.… Respondents

Present :

Mr. Prabhakar Narayan, Advocate, for the appellants.

Mr. Naresh Pant, Advocate, for the respondents.

Dated: 21st April, 2022

JUDGEMENT

Hon’ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.

The appellants, herein, had preferred these three

connected Appeal from Orders, by invoking the provisions

contained under Section 37 of the Arbitration and

Conciliation Act, 1986, by putting a challenge to the orders,

which had been passed under Section 34 of the Arbitration

2

Act, by the learned District Judge, in Arbitration Case Nos.

104 of 2018, 103 of 2018 and 100 of 2018 respec

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top