SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SAI INSTITUTE OF PARAMEDICAL AND ALLIED SCIENCES – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Advocates:
['BHUPESH KANDPAL', '', 'GURBANI SINGH', 'C S C', 'DR KARTIKEY HARI GUPTA', 'SHAILENDRA NAURIYAL']

IN HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND

AT NAINITAL

Writ Petition No.429 of 2021 (M/S)

Sai Institute of Paramedical And Allied Sciences

..…Petitioner

Vs.

State of Uttarakhand and others

…Respondents

Advocate: Mr. Bhupesh Kandpal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. M.S. Bisht, Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand/respondent no.1.

Dr. Kartikey Hari Gupta, Advocate for respondent no.2.

Mr. Shailendra Nauriyal, Advocate for respondent no.3.

Hon’ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.

(Through Hybrid Mode)

The institution of the petitioner imparts education in various

disciplines of Paramedical Sciences and particularly they are engaged in

imparting education to the students in the discipline of BPT i.e. Bachelor of

Physiotherapy, B.Sc. MLT i.e. Bachelor of Science in Medical Laboratory

Technology, B.Sc. MM i.e. Bachelor of Science in Medical Microbiology, MPT

and M.Sc. MLT.

2.

The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the

institution of the petitioner was granted an affiliation to conduct the aforesaid

courses in accordance with the provision contained under Section 37(2) of the

U.P. State

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top