SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

State Of Uttarakhand – Appellant
Versus
Abid Ali @ Asad Ali @ Ajit Singh @ Abu Bakar – Respondent


Advocates:
['G A', 'PIYUSH GARG', '', 'S C DUMKA AMICUS CURAIE', 'B D PANDE', 'H C PATHAK', 'PRADEEP UPRETI']

Reserved

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

Government Appeal No. 33 of 2014

State of Uttarakhand

...Appellant

Versus

Abid Ali @ Asad Ali @ Ajit Singh @ Abu Bakar

….Respondent

Present:-

Mr. G.S. Sandhu, Government Advocate assisted by Mr. Lalit

Miglani, A.G.A. for the State/appellant.

Mr. S.C. Dumka, Amicus Curiae.

Ms. Manisha Bhandari, Mr. B.D. Pandey and Mr. H.C. Pathak,

Advocates for the respondent.

JUDGMENT

Per: Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J.

Instant Government Appeal is preferred against

the judgment and order dated 22.07.2013, passed in Jail

Appeal No. 7 of 2013, Asad Ali Vs. State of Uttarakhand, by

the court of 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Haridwar (for

short, “the appeal”). By the impugned judgment and order,

the conviction and sentence of the respondent Abid Ali @

Asad Ali @ Abu Bakar @ Ajeet Singh (hereinafter referred to

as “the accused”), under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 469,

471 & 120B IPC, Section 14 Foreigners Act, 1946 (for short,

“the Foreigners Act”), Section 12 (1A)(a) of the Passports Act,

1967 (for short, “the Passports Act”), Section 3 of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top