SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
GOPAL SINGH BISHT – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Advocates:
['MANOJ BHATT', '', 'SACHIN', 'VIKRAMADITYA SHAH', 'G A']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND

AT NAINITAL

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA

05TH MARCH, 2022

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.369 of 2022

Between:

Gopal Singh Bisht.

…Petitioner.

and

State of Uttarakhand and Others.

...Respondents.

Counsel for the Petitioner:

Mr. M.S. Pal, learned Senior

Advocate assisted by Mr.

Sachin, learned counsel.

Counsel for the State/

:

Respondent nos. 1to 4.

Mr. T.C. Agarwal, learned

Deputy Advocate General

assisted

by

Mr.

Rohit

Dhyani,

learned

Brief

Holder for the State.

Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma, J.

This Criminal Writ Petition has been filed under

Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of

certiorari to quash the impugned First Information Report

No.03 of 2021, registered with Police Station Vigilance

Establishment Sector Nainital, Haldwani, District Nainital

Uttarakhand for the offence under Sections 420, 468,

469, 471, 182, 120B, 153A of IPC, Section 66C and

Section 66D of the Information Technology Act, 2000.

2.

Heard Mr. M.S. Pal, the learned Senior

Advocate assisted by Mr. Sachin, the learned counsel for

2

the petitioner and M

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top