SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

Pradeep Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Uttarakhand AND OTHERS – Respondent


Advocates:
['VIJAY BHATT', '', 'DEVENDRA PANT', 'B D PANDE', 'Amar Shukla', 'PARIKSHIT SAINI']

 

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND

AT NAINITAL

Writ Petition (S/S) No. 1581 of 2016

Pradeep Kumar

Petitioner

Versus

State of Uttarakhand & Others

…Respondents

 

Present:

Mr. Amar Shukla, Advocate for the petitioner

Mr.

Pooran

Singh

Bisht,

Brief

Holder

for

the

State/respondent nos. 1 & 2

Mr. I.P. Gairola, Advocate for respondent no. 4.

Ms. Soniya Chawla, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Paresh

Tripathi, Advocate for respondent no. 6

Hon’ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.

The petitioner is a routine grade clerk working

respondent no.5, he feeling himself aggrieved by the

order dated 02.07.2016 as passed by Respondent No.4,

seeks to challenge the same by virtue of the present

petition.

2.

By impugned order dated 02.07.2016, the

petitioner has been placed under suspension for the

precise charges of irregularities of non-compliance of

orders, causing financial loss to society, making

fraudulent

signature

of

Secretary

and

Manager

presenting himself before SLAO as Secretary giving

consent for quantum of compensation thus causing loss

etc., which have been leveled against him in the

impugned order of suspensi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top