HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
NARENDRA KUMAR AGGARWAL – Appellant
Versus
DEVKI NANDAN SARRAFF – Respondent
IN HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AT NAINITAL
Civil Revision No.110 of 2017
Narendra Kumar Aggarwal
..…Defendant/Revisionist
Vs.
Devki Nandan Sarraff & others
…..Plaintiff/Respondents
Advocate: Mr. Prince Chauhan, Advocate for the revisionist
Mr. Pulak Agarwal, Advocate for the respondents.
Hon’ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.
It is defendants revision preferred under Section 115 of the Code of
Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as C.P.C.), where the defendant
has put a challenge to the impugned order of 22.05.2017, as it has been passed
by the court of learned Civil Judge (Senior Division) Kashipur, District Udham
Singh Nagar in Suit No.17 of 2014 Devki Nandan Sarraff vs. Narendra Kumar
Aggarwal & Others, whereby the learned trial court, had decided the issue no.7,
relating to the implications of Order 2 Rule 2 of C.P.C. against the defendant.
2.
Brief facts of the case are that the plaintiff/respondent herein on
21.01.2014, had instituted a suit in relation to the disputed property which was
more appropriately described at the foot of the plaint constituting, to be a
property in the shape of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.