SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MOHAMMAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Advocates:
['SHIVANGI GANGWAR', '', 'KAMAL KISHOR HARBOLA', 'MANOJ LAKHCHURA', 'SHAKTI SINGH', 'RADHA ARYA', 'G A']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

Criminal Appeal No. 258 of 2014

Mohammad S/o Deen Mohammad

R/o Village-Mohammad Anetha,

P.S. Pensa, District-Kaushambi (U.P.)

Presently Canteen No.1 Mandir Parisar,

Haldwani, District-Nainital …..…Appellant

Versus

State of Uttarakhand

..…….Respondent

Mr. Shakti Singh, Advocate for the appellant.

Mr. V.S. Rathore, A.G.A. with Ms. Shivangi Gangwar & Gajendra Tripathi, Brief

Holder for the State.

Hon'ble Lok Pal Singh, J.

This criminal appeal is directed against the

judgment and order dated 15/16.7.2014 passed by

Special Judge (POCSO Act)/Sessions Judge, Nainital,

whereby the appellant has been convicted under Section

377 of IPC and has been sentenced to undergo rigorous

imprisonment for a period of seven years alongwith a

fine of Rs.20,000/-. He has been further convicted under

Section 323 of I.P.C. and has been sentenced to undergo

rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year. He has

been further convicted under Section 506 of I.P.C. and

has been directed to undergo rigorous imprisonment for

a period of two years. It was directed that all the

sentences were run co

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top