SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
NAR SINGH NARAYAN DUBE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND and ANOTHER – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND

AT NAINITAL

Criminal Writ Petition No.784 of 2010

Nar Singh Narayan Dube

……Petitioner

Versus

State of Uttarakhand and others

.…Respondents

Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J.

Hon’ble Nirmal Yadav, J.

Sri Birendra Singh Adhikari, Advocate present for

the petitioner.

Sri

S.S.

Adhikari,

A.G.A.

present

for

the

State/respondents.

By means of this petition moved under Article 226

of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has sought a writ in

the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent No. 1

for taking decision on the representation (annexure No.8 to

the petition) for transfer of investigation of Crime No.788 of

2006, Police Station Kotwali Nagar, Haridwar to the Central

Bureau of Investigation.

Heard.

Perusal of the papers on record shows that one

Jagan Nath Tiwari (not impleaded as party) lodged first

information report against accused namely Satya Prakash,

Amit Kumar, Pappu and Anil Kumar (None impleaded as party

in the writ petition), relating to the offences punishable under

section 302, 394 IPC at police station Kotwali Nagar, Haridwar

which was registered as C

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top