SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AKRAM ALI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND

AT NAINITAL

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA

27th MARCH, 2023

FOURTH BAIL APPLICATION No. 2 of 2023

Between:

Akram Ali

…Applicant

and

State of Uttarakhand.

..…Respondent

Counsel for the Applicant : Mr. Mohd. Safdar,

Advocate.

Counsel for the State/

: Mr. S.S. Adhikari, Deputy

respondent

Advocate General with Ms.

Shivangi Gangwar, Brief

Holder for the State.

Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma, J.

This is the Fourth Bail Application. The First Bail

Application was rejected on 23.07.2018. The Second Bail

Application was rejected on 17.11.2021 and the Third Bail

Application was withdrawn on 10.02.2023. The present bail

application is being considered as more than one year has

been elapsed since the second bail application of the

applicant was rejected.

2.

Present Bail Application has been filed for grant of

regular bail in connection with Case Crime No. 133 of 2014

registered at Police Station Raipur, District Dehradun.

Applic

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top