SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

REEDHYCALOG LIMITED PARTNERSHIP – Appellant
Versus
ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND

AT NAINITAL

Writ Petition No. 567 of 2013 (S/S)

Narendra Singh Rana

…..Petitioner

Versus

Uttarakhand Public Service Commission, Haridwar

......….Respondent

Writ Petition No. 568 of 2013 (S/S)

Vikash Chandra Ramola

…..Petitioner

Versus

Uttarakhand Public Service Commission and another

......….Respondents

Writ Petition No. 664 of 2013 (S/S)

Laxmikant Sharma

…..Petitioner

Versus

Uttarakhand Public Service Commission, Haridwar

......….Respondent

Present:

Mr. S.K. Mandal, Mr. Pankaj Chaturvedi and Mr. M.K. Ray, Advocates for

the petitioners.

Mr. B.D. Kandpal, Advocate for Uttarakhand Public Service

Commission/respondent.

Hon’ble Alok Singh, J (Oral).

Uttarakhand

Public

Service

Commission

advertised several posts of Junior Engineers vide

notification/advertisement dated 25.8.2011, Annexure

No. 1 to the writ petition. As per condition no. 17 (5) of

the advertisement, successful candidates in the written

examination

would

be

provided

with

conventional

application form by the Commission. As per conditio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top