SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

CHANDRA PAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND THROUGH COLLECTOR HARIDWAR – Respondent


WPMS No. 892 of 2016

Hon’ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.

Mr. Narendra Bali, Advocate, for the

petitioner.

Mr. R.C. Arya, Standing Counsel for the

State.

Alleging that the deed which was executed

by Sumer Chandra by virtue of the sale deed dated

02.03.1996, selling the property constituting to be

of 5 biswa and 5 biswancis of land, it is said to be

in violation of the provisions contained under

Section 157ka(ka) to be read with Section 157ka of

UPZA & LR Act. As the sale is alleged to have

been made without obtaining a prior permission in

writing from the competent authority, because it

was the land vested with the OBC category of

tenure holder.

The proceeding was drawn before the Court

of Collector, Haridwar, who by an order dated

07.03.2003, had passed the following directions:-

**oknh dk okn Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gSA fookfnr Hkwfe

[kljk uEcj 35@4 jdck 0-345 gS0 esa ls 0-059 gS0 jkT;

ljdkj esa fcuk Hkkj ds fufgr dh tkrh gSA fookfnr Hkwfe ls

lesjpUnz iq= vk”kkjke dk uke fujLr dj lEifRr jkT;

ljdkj jktLo vfHkys[kksa esa vafdr djrs g;s dCtk izkIr fd;k

tk;saA i=koyh ckn vko”;d dk;Zokgh vfHkys[kkxkj esa lafpr

dh tk;saA**

As a consequence of the order of the

Collecto

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top