SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani
NAR SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

Second Bail Application No.77 of 2022

Nar Singh

….....Applicant

Versus

State of Uttarakhand

….….Respondent

Present:-

Mr. Kaushal Pandey, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Harsh Vardhan

Dhanik, Advocate for the applicant.

Mr. Lalit Miglani, A.G.A. with Ms. Sonika Khulbe, Brief Holder for

the State.

Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)

Applicant Nar Singh is in judicial custody in

FIR No.14 of 2021, under Sections 323, 504, 506, 147,

149, 304 IPC, Police Station Danya, District Almora. He

has sought his release on bail.

2.

This is second bail application. First bail

application has already been rejected on 16.07.2021.

3.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and

perused the record.

4.

Learned counsel for the applicant would

submit that the father of the applicant died on

2

10.04.2021 and now, to perform the varshik shraddh, the

applicant be released on bail.

5.

Learned counsel for the applicant could not

tell, as to when the presence of the petitioner is required?

He is not in a position to tell it. In the second bail

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top