SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
STATE INFRASTRUCTURE AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT – Appellant
Versus
REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER and ORS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

Writ Petition (M/S) No.1726 of 2010.

State Infrastructure and Industrial Development Corporation of

Uttarakhand Ltd. (SIDCUL) (Nodal Agency of Govt. of Uttarakhand,

representing Jaspur and Kashipur spinning Units of UPSTC) (through

its DGM (P&A)Shri S.K.Sharma) 2-New Cantt Road, Dehradun.

… Petitioner.

Vs.

The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner (RPFC), Employees

Provident Fund Organization (EPFO), General Mahadev Singh Road,

Dehradun and two others.

…Respondents.

Mr. Pulak Raj Mullick, Advocate, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Mr. D.S.Patni, Advocate, learned counsel for the respondents.

Date October 07, 2010.

Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J.

(Stay Application No. 8653 of 2010)

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the

record.

By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has sought a

writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the recovery certificates dated

26-06-2010 amounting to Rs. 1,04,768/- (Annexurre-1) and dated 13-

9-2010 for Rs. 1,90,000/- (Annexure-4) and directing the respondent

no. 3 to return both the certificates of recovery to the respondent no.2.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top