SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
USMAN ALIAS SAMIR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Advocates:
['RAJENDRA SINGH AZAD', '', 'MOHD SAFDAR', 'PARIKSHIT SAINI', 'GAURAV SINGH', 'G A']

Reserved Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

Criminal Appeal No. 206 of 2020

Usman @ Sameer

…..

Appellant

Versus

State of Uttarakhand

..…. Respondent

Mr. Parikshit Saini, Advocate for the appellant.

Mr. Shubhash Tyagi Bharadwaj, Deputy Advocate General with Ms.

Shivangi Gangwar, Brief Holder for the respondent/State.

[Per: Hon’ble Lok Pal Singh, J.]

Criminal law was set into motion at the

instance of PW1 (complainant and sister of the

victim) who submitted a report (Ext. A-1) with P.S.

Kotwali Gangnahar, Roorkee, District Haridwar on

28.03.2016 at 21:35 hours stating therein, that her

sister, who is a minor was enticed away by accused

Usman @ Sameer, r/o House No. 657, Banda Road,

Roorkee on 11.03.2016, but father of accused did

not permit them to enter the house and instead

handed them over to the police. The victim was

given in the custody of her father before the

Magistrate. On her return back to her house, sister

of the complainant told that the accused-appellant

took her to hotel Maya Palace on 27.10.2015, where

he committed rape forcibly with the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top