SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

RAHBAR ALI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

ORIGINAL JURISDICTION

Dated: Nainital: the 15th day of December 2009

Ist Bail Application No.388 of 2009

Order on the Bail application of accused.

CRIMINAL SIDE

Rahbar Ali

..….Applicant (In Jail)

Versus

State of Uttarakhand

…….Opposite party

Dated: December 15, 2009

____________________________________________________________________

Arising out of Case Crime No.459/2008

Under Section 14 of Foreigners Act and Section 12 of Passport

Act and Section 4 of the Passport Entry into India Act,

P.S. Kotwali Roorkee, District Haridwar

________________________________________________________________

Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J.

Heard Sri Navneet Kaushik, learned counsel for the

applicant as well as Sri Amit Bhatt, learned Addl. GA for

the State and also perused the record.

As per the prosecution story on 4.11.2008 the

applicant

alongwith

four

co-accused

persons

was

apprehended by the Police. The applicant-accused and

co-accused persons were Bangladeshi. When they were

asked to show their identity card/visa they could not

show it. The accused persons admitted that

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top