RAMRATI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
SL.
No
Date
Office Notes,
reports, orders
or proceedings
or directions and
Registrar’s order
with Signatures
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
W PSS 5 5 1 / 2 0 2 0
W it h
W PSS 5 4 9 / 2 0 2 0
Hon ’ble Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J.
Mr. Prabhat Bohra, Advocate, for the
petitioners.
Ms. Mamta Bisht, Deputy Advocate
General, for the State.
Mr.
Raveendra
Singh
Bisht,
Advocate, for the intervener.
Intervention
applications
(IA/ 6323/ 2022
and
IA/ 10080/ 2022)
are
allowed.
Amended
memos
of
parties
be
supplied during the course of the day.
Heard
learned
Counsel
for
the
parties and perused the record.
Since controversy involved in both
the writ petitions is one and the same,
these are being decided together by this
common judgment and order. For brevity,
facts of Writ Petition No. 551 of 2020 (S/ S)
are being referred.
Petitioner was appointed in Health
Department in District Saharanpur as Health
Worker (Female) on 21.11.1985. District
Saharanpur was reorganised and District
Haridwar came into being on 1.7.1990 and
services of petitioner were transferred from
District Saharanpur to District Haridwar and
she joined duties in
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.