SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

RAMRATI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Advocates:
['PRABHAT BOHRA', 'C S C', '', 'RAVEENDRA SINGH BISHT', 'DEVENDRA SINGH BOHRA']

SL.

No

Date

Office Notes,

reports, orders

or proceedings

or directions and

Registrar’s order

with Signatures

COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS

W PSS 5 5 1 / 2 0 2 0

W it h

W PSS 5 4 9 / 2 0 2 0

Hon ’ble Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J.

Mr. Prabhat Bohra, Advocate, for the

petitioners.

Ms. Mamta Bisht, Deputy Advocate

General, for the State.

Mr.

Raveendra

Singh

Bisht,

Advocate, for the intervener.

Intervention

applications

(IA/ 6323/ 2022

and

IA/ 10080/ 2022)

are

allowed.

Amended

memos

of

parties

be

supplied during the course of the day.

Heard

learned

Counsel

for

the

parties and perused the record.

Since controversy involved in both

the writ petitions is one and the same,

these are being decided together by this

common judgment and order. For brevity,

facts of Writ Petition No. 551 of 2020 (S/ S)

are being referred.

Petitioner was appointed in Health

Department in District Saharanpur as Health

Worker (Female) on 21.11.1985. District

Saharanpur was reorganised and District

Haridwar came into being on 1.7.1990 and

services of petitioner were transferred from

District Saharanpur to District Haridwar and

she joined duties in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top