SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Smt. Satya – Appellant
Versus
State Of Uttarakhand AND OTHERS – Respondent


Advocates:
['RAMJI SRIVASTAVA', '', 'ANKUR SHARMA', 'G A']

WPCRL No. 1564 of 2018

Hon’ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.

Mr. Ramji Srivastava, Advocate for the

petitioner.

Mr. Sandeep Tandon, Deputy Advocate

General assisted by Mr. Lalit Miglani, Brief

Holder for the State of Uttarakhand.

The petitioner is 69 years of age. She

is co-accused in F.I.R. No. 341 of 2018, under

Sections 147, 148, 354, 452 and 307 of the

I.P.C., loded with Police Station Rishikesh,

District Dehradun.

The allegations in the F.I.R. are that

number of persons equipped with kulhari,

sariya, patal and other weapons had entered

into the house of the complainant and

assaulted Puja and Anil, due to which, they

have suffered grievous injuries. The injury

report finds place on record as Annexure

No.2. No doubt, apparently, the injuries on

persons are serious in nature, most of them

being inflicted on head.

Looking to the contents of the F.I.R.

and also considering the age of the petitioner,

as no specific role has been assigned in the

F.I.R. as against the petitioner nor does it

discloses that whether she has used any

weapon in inflicting the injuries on Puja and

Anil.

In that view of the matter, there will be

an interim order that t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top