SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
RAVEESH JAIN – Appellant
Versus
HUKUM CHANDRA JAIN – Respondent


Advocates:
['GHANSHYAM JOSHI', 'MOHIT KUMAR', '', 'KM MEENU', 'SIDDHARTHA SINGH', 'P S BISHT', 'KSHITIJ SAH']

SL.

No

Date

Office Notes,

reports, orders or

proceedings or

directions and

Registrar’s order

with Signatures

COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS

WPMS No. 871 of 2022

Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.

Mr. Ghanshyam Joshi, Advocate for the

petitioner.

Mr. Siddhartha Singh and Mr. Mohit Kumar,

Advocates for the respondent.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

By means of this writ petition, petitioner has

challenged the order dated 10.03.2022 passed by

learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kashipur,

District Udham Singh Nagar in Civil Suit No. 117

of 2021. By the said order, application filed by

defendant (respondent herein) under Order 9 Rule 7

CPC was allowed subject to cost of Rs. 1,000/-. By

the same order, ex-parte interim order passed in

favour of plaintiff, on 11.10.2021, was also

recalled.

Perusal of earlier order dated 11.10.2021

reveals that based on the report of process server

that service of notice upon defendant is complete,

learned trial Court closed his opportunity of filing

objection to the temporary injunction application

and also of filing written statement.

By the same order, learned trial Court

allowed the tempo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top