HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
DR. PRADIP KUMAR GHOSH and ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
BARUN KUMAR BANERJEE – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
A.O. No. 398 of 2008
Dr. Pradip Kumar Ghosh, Chairman, Board of Trustees,
Washington Kali Temple, 16126 Columbia- Pike,
Burtons Ville, Maryland- 20866 USA and another -Appellants.
Versus
Barun Kumar Banerjee S/o Sri Deb Kumar
Banerjee
- Respondent.
Mr. Siddharth Shah, Advocate for the appellants.
Mr. B.M. Pingal and Mr. Narendra Bali, Advocates for the respondents.
(Hon’ble B.S. Verma, J.)
This appeal has been preferred against the judgment and
order dated 22-8-2008, passed by Civil Judge (Senior Division),
Haridwar, in Misc. Case No. 67 of 2008, Dr. Pradeep Kumar Ghosh
and another Vs. Barun Kumar Banerjee, whereby the application of
the petitioner filed U/O 9 Rule 13 C.P.C. to set aside the expartee
decree, was rejected.
The learned counsel for the appellant has vehemently
urged that the delay in filing the application U/O 9 Rule 13 C.P.C.
was 19 days, and the learned trial court should have condoned the
delay.
Learned counsel for the appellant has also submitted that
the respondent can be compensated by award of cost while condoning
the delay in filing
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.