SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
DEEPAK SAXENA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Advocates:
['ABHISHEK VERMA', '', 'MEHBOOB RAHI', 'AYUSH SAXENA', 'G A']

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

First Bail Application No. 1012 of 2022

Deepak Saxena

….....Applicant

Versus

State of Uttarakhand

….….Respondent

Present:-

Mr. Abhishek Verma, Advocate for the applicant.

Mr. Lalit Miglani, A.G.A. for the State.

With

First Bail Application No. 1376 of 2022

Ravindra Arora

….....Applicant

Versus

State of Uttarakhand

….….Respondent

Present:-

Mr. Raj Kumar Singh, Advocate for the applicant.

Mr. Lalit Miglani, A.G.A. for the State.

Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)

Since both these bail applications arise from

one and the same FIR, they are being decided by this

common order.

2.

Applicants Deepak Saxena and Ravindra Arora

are in judicial custody in FIR No.181 of 2022, under

Sections 8/22/60 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic

Substances Act, 1985 (for short, “the Act”), Police Station

2

Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar. They have sought

their release on bail.

3.

Heard learned counsel for the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top